Archives for the month of: August, 2010

Here’s the latest dirge for the noble book and it’s toiling author in an article from the Guardian. Author Ewan Morrison laments the passing of the book. Well, it’s a little more callus and self-serving than that.  He’s not morning the loss of the texture and smell of those paper books we all love, of the way a great story can wrap us in its narrative and distract us for hours or haunt us for years. Instead, Morrison has a more important question:

But let’s leave the survival of the paper book alone, and ask the more important question: Will writers be able to make a living and continue writing in the digital era?

Ah…here we are. The crux of the issue for Mr. Morrison and all writers of his ilk who share this lament. Nevermind the actual books…let’s instead worry about how writers (like, perhaps, Mr. Morrison himself) will be able to cash in in this era of the free and ubiquitous. Or, to put it bluntly,why the fuck would I read Mr. Morrison’s work when I can download–say–Mark Twain for free? Great question.

Mr. Morrison goes on in that infuriating article to mourn “The Retreat of Advances” and other such hardships that novelists are having to endure these days. Ah, the fat advance. Morrison insists that a huge advance is actually the key to great literature (and to think I’d always thought it was those muses):

To ask whether International Man Booker prizewinner Philip Roth could have written 24 novels and the award-winning American trilogy without advances is like asking if Michelangelo could have painted the Sistine Chapel without the patronage of Pope Julius II. The economic framework that supports artists is as important as the art itself; if you remove one from the other then things fall apart.

I like Philip Roth as much as the next guy, but he’s been retreading the rather narrow, angst-ridden, semi-autobiographical streets of Newark, NJ in his Nathan Zuckerman novels for years. Have these advances really inspired Roth to greatness? Or have they just prolonged his navel-gazing? To compare Roth to Michelangelo is…well…kind of a stretch. And then to insist that the main reason that such fine Rothian literature gets produced is due to the corporate publishing model–with it’s Victorian roots and gaggles of agents, editors and mid-level marketing execs cashing in at every stop in the process between author and reader–is beyond silly.

I’m tired of hearing the dire refrain. I’m actually inspired by the new possibilities in storytelling. But for folks like Morrison, it all boils down to this: “If I don’t get paid to write my semi-autobiographical bourgeois ’literature,’ and if…God forbid…I have to get a real job, the world as we know it will begin to crumble!” Writers, literary writers especially, think they deserve to receive checks in the mail for what they do. Which is horseshit.

I’m not saying that just because I’m a working stiff writer with very modest publishing credentials. The main reason I find Morrison’s sentiment pathetic is due to my recent foray into independent filmmaking. If anything, it’s a more demanding pursuit in terms of persistence, blood, sweat and treasure than writing. And I’ve met folks who have mortgaged their houses, sacrificed marriages, given up careers and moved in with their mothers at the age of forty…all for the sake of creating their art. And I’m not talking about pulphouse B-movies…those genre films actually have a chance at making a little money. I’m talking about very excellent, thoughtful, well-crafted and intelligent independent features and documentaries.

There’s very little money in filmmaking. The old saw is, “If you want to make a small fortune in the film business, start with a large one.” I see people with leaky roofs and trashy cars maxing out their credit cards to buy camera gear or to pay for catering to feed volunteer actors. I’ve borrowed money from friends and family. I’ve begged for cash. It makes me sick to slip around with my hand out, expecting folks who don’t have much money to begin with to kick in for my project so I can play around with a camera. But in film, if you want to finish a project, that’s what you have to do. Plenty of months go by when I invest in a film before I make that deposit into my kid’s college fund. I’ve managed to (mostly) avoid the credit card debt with plagues so many indie film folks. But I’ve kicked quite a few chips into the kitty over the years. Writers actually have it easy: their art costs them nothing to make. Zero! Zilch!

Writers actually have it easy: their art costs them nothing to make. Zero! Zilch!

Sure, there are film folks in LA getting rich. Many of them even make fantastic movies. But if there is a genre in film that compares with great literature of the ages, it’s that independent genre that is fueled by espresso, tips from waiting tables and maxed out credit cards. Folks give blood to make moves. Robert Rodriguez famously sold his body to science to finance his first film.

So after hearing a jackass like Morrison whine about how all those who love books are duty bound to defend the old publishing model, I’m ready to relinquish the title of “writer.”  I’ll still write scripts. Maybe even another novel or two. I’ll most likely end up giving them all away, or in the case of a narrative film, end up investing my retirement fund in making it happen. And instead persisting to carry the  whining title of “writer,” I’ll pick up the title of “filmmaker” where I’ll be among blue collar folks who are willing to roll up their sleeves and make sacrifices for their art, to beg money off of family or to work a real job to make ends meet, putting together projects nights, weekends or during two week vacations from work.

And if writers like Morrison and Roth truly require corporate patronage to be inspired to create great work, and if the absence of the fat advance renders them literarily impotent, then I just have to say “good riddance.” Go sulk. Quit writing. Somebody else will be willing to step up and write something solid. Or I can always go back to Mark Twain.

Just a word of caution, though. If you quit writing, or if those advance checks stop rolling in, you may find you have to go out and get a real job. And if you can write HTML code or solid advertising copy, and if you’re willing to bust your ass while you’re on the clock, then you’re even welcome to come apply where I work. And, if you want, you can come out to a shoot some weekend and help by holding a boom mic. I might even feed you if you do.

Update – 08-11-10 – ReadWriteWeb offered 5 reasons why paper books are better than eBooks. Kobo offers a host of free eBooks including every classic you’ll ever need to read.

It’s been at least ten years since I first started thinking seriously about eBooks and getting excited about the idea.  I had a Palm Pilot for work, and the display was poor and the Internet connection was horrible. But I loved the idea of carrying an entire library in my pocket. Still, I never even purchased the first book. The Palm Pilot is probably in some museum right now. Maybe the Gutenberg Museum we recently visited in Mainz, Germany.

Well, it’s taken me ten years to finally give it a try. What I needed was the right device and a strong reason to jump in. I bought an iPhone a couple years ago. But still, I didn’t download the Kindle app and a book until  my friend Daren Dean released his amazing novel, Far Beyond the Pale, on Amazon. I downloaded the app and fired up the book, and now I’m thoroughly enjoying both Daren’s excellent writing and the experience of reading a novel electronically.

Readwriteweb recently gave five reasons why eBooks are better than their paper ancestors.Though they highlight some amazing features of eBooks that aren’t available in the dead tree format, I wouldn’t go so far as saying this makes them superior. There’s still nothing quite like the smell of a fresh (or old and dusty) book, or the feel of pulp in your hands. There’s a sensory pleasure in reading a paper book that can’t be replicated digitally.

But the actual act reading, of experiencing words, even on the iPhone’s small screen, is just as engaging as reading on paper. You can make notes, highlight, save your spot. The iPhone allows you to flip pages with your thumb, adding a new level of touch to the experience that pressing a button can’t give you. The digital annotation tools are more efficient than the analog system of sticky notes, highlighters, bent corners and margin scrawls (albeit aesthetically less pleasing). The price is also fantastic. Daren is self-published, but I was able to buy his novel at a price on Kindle that allowed him a better profit margin (per copy) than if he’d connected with a traditional publisher.

Some writers and book lovers may think that the advent of eBooks is a sad day for novels, words and books in general. I think that’s pessimistic horse shit.

There’s also something nice about the short page length on an iPhone…it gives you the feeling of headlong progress (through the 4,000+ pages that Daren’s novel reaches in this format). I thought I’d need time to adjust to thousands of micropages compared to the traditional200-400 page length of a novel, but it’s been no problem at all. In fact, I appreciate being able to flip a page or two between giving my kid a bath or waiting for her to brush her teeth. It seems easier to dip in and out of a novel than reading a fraction of a longer, standard-length page.

Some writers and book lovers may think that the advent of viable eBook platforms is a sad day for novels, words and books in general. I think that’s pessimistic horse shit. eBooks may just be what saves the novel form in this digital age. The new platform introduces the novel experience to people who are used to consuming all of their information on a mobile device and wouldn’t otherwise think to read something of that length. It saves trees. It allows self-published authors to reach a global audience in minutes. It enhances the opportunity to deepen the novel experience with, say, video of the author reading or social highlighting and notes that give you an instant book discussion group. The future of the book-length manuscript would be far more precarious if they didn’t translate so smoothly to the Kindle, iPhone and iPad.

And it’s silly to think that paper books will die as a result of the growing popularity of eBooks. We all now have keyboards and mobile devices that shoot video and record audio. People write blogs and online diaries and send volumes of digitally composed email. But personal journals are as popular as ever. Moleskine notebooks are on sale everywhere. I see them in every coffee shop in Oregon, but I also recently returned from Germany and Italy, and they’re all over Europe as well. Every corner in Florence seemed to have a fine stationary shop, where Moleskines were the cheap option, and antique leather notebooks fetched ridiculous prices. There’s still a place for the handwritten word five hundred years after Gutenberg. People will always read paper books as well.

Girl printing in the Gutenberg Museum Print Shop

While we were in Germany, we stopped at  the Gutenberg Museum. My daughter joined her cousins in making prints in the museum’s hands-on print shop. She was thrilled by the tactile, mechanical experience of creating art in a method not unlike Gutenberg used when he printed his first Bible page a half millennium ago. This experience could never be replicated digitally. The art hanging on the walls of the print shop was innovative, and had a warm, comfortable feeling. Prints will be decorating walls for as long as I’m alive. Gutenberg’s invention brought the Bible and a host of other materials to the hands of people who didn’t have access to them before. He created a world of readers, expanding the simple practice of reading to the great unwashed. eBooks have the potential of bringing novels and book-length manuscripts forward, not only reaching people who already read them, but even introducing them to folks who never would have thought to pick up a manuscript on their own before.

Gutenberg Bible

So for writers and serious readers, there’s nothing to fear from eBooks. Bookstores will still exist. Some will flourish, and some will close. But books and novel manuscripts will persist. Writers like Daren Dean will be able to share their stories with friends on the other side of the country, and hopefully even reach a wider audience. Far Beyond the Pale is a compelling novel with an engaging voice. It’s a little raw, but it’s better than a lot of the pap that I’ve bought from traditional publishers in the past year. It also has a feeling of personal authenticity that other novels I’ve read recently. Maybe it’s because I know Daren, or maybe it’s because the digital age is allowing novelists to engage readers without the filter of big corporate publishers.

Daren is an amazing writer who surrounds his readers with voice-driven prose and rich, tactile imagery that comes through just as well on screen as it does on paper. And even traditional publishers and agents have been telling him for years that he’s an amazing writer, though, “the market is just too tough right now.” But today he’s now able to reach the audience he deserves.

Gutenberg would be pleased.